Blog Post

Gospel, Triage, Warnings, Encouragement, and Going Deeper

January 31, 2026

The Gospel First

A pastoral guide to being born again, theological triage, and avoiding divisive “add-ons”

If you’ve spent any time around Christian conversations online (or in real life), you’ve seen it: genuine hunger for God… mixed with confusion, pressure, and sometimes dogma that goes beyond Scripture.

This post is not written to “take shots” at anyone. It’s written to protect the clarity of the Gospel, to help seekers genuinely be born again, and to help believers practice discernment without paranoia—especially when someone insists that one particular experience, teacher, or formula is the only proof you’re saved.

1) The centre: the true Gospel of Christ

The Gospel is not “do better.” It is not “get an experience.” It is not “join our tribe.”
The Gospel is good news about what God has done in Jesus Christ.

What Scripture makes clear

  • Jesus is the only way to the Father (John 14:6).

  • We all have sinned and need rescue (Rom 3:23).

  • Jesus lived, died for our sins, and rose again (1 Cor 15:1–4).

  • We are saved by grace through faith (Eph 2:8–10).

  • True faith produces the “obedience of faith” (Rom 1:5), real fruit, and a changed life (James 2; Gal 5:22–23).

  • Eternal life is knowing God in Christ (John 17:3).

Being born again

Jesus says we must be “born from above” (John 3:3). This is not a self-improvement plan; it’s spiritual rebirth—God giving life to the spiritually dead (Eph 2:1–5).

A simple biblical roadmap looks like this:

  1. Repent and believe (Confess and proclaim)
    Repentance is a real turning of the heart to God (Luke 13:3). Faith is trusting Jesus—His person, His cross, His resurrection (Rom 10:9–10).

  2. Receive Christ
    Those who receive Him are given the right to become children of God—born of God (John 1:12–13).

  3. Be united to Christ
    We die to our sinful nature and rise to new life with and in Him (Rom 6:1–6). We become a new creation (2 Cor 5:17).

  4. Begin the Spirit-led life
    Abide in Christ (John 15:1–17). Walk by the Spirit (Gal 5:13-26). Grow in sanctification and love (1 Thess 4; 1 Cor 13).

The anchor is not “Did I have the same experience as someone else?”
The anchor is “Am I trusting Jesus Christ, and is His life bearing fruit in me by the Spirit?” (Even though we all still fall short of His glory, and the Father will keep pruning us until we are made perfect when Jesus comes back, the finisher and perfector of our faith)

2) Where does water baptism fit?

Baptism matters. It is commanded by Jesus (Matt 28:18–20), practiced by the early church, and richly symbolic of union with Christ (Rom 6:4). It is normally part of coming to Christ publicly and entering the disciple-life.

But Scripture also gives more than one conversion pattern:

  • The thief on the cross demonstrates salvation can occur without the opportunity for water baptism (Luke 23:39–43).

  • Cornelius’ household receives the Holy Spirit with manifestations of speaking in unknown tongues before water baptism (Acts 10:44–48).

  • In Acts, sometimes signs accompany receiving the Spirit; sometimes the emphasis is simply that they believed, received, and were incorporated into the church’s life.

A pastoral way to hold this:

  • Baptism is a commanded act of obedience and a profound means of discipleship and confession.

  • It should be taught clearly and offered joyfully.

  • But we must not preach baptism (or any external marker like speaking in foreign tongues) as a replacement for Christ or as a weapon to deny someone’s salvation when Scripture itself shows complexity.

3) Theological triage: choosing the right “hills”

Theological triage is a framework used by Christians to discern the relative weight of doctrines—like triage in medicine prioritizes urgency and severity. It was popularized by Albert Mohler and helpfully developed for everyday believers by Gavin Ortlund in Finding the Right Hills to Die On.

A practical triage grid:

First-order (essential)

These are gospel-defining. Denying them reshapes Christianity into something else.

  • The Triune God (Father, Son, Spirit)

  • The full deity and humanity of Jesus

  • Christ’s atoning death and bodily resurrection

  • Salvation by grace through faith in Christ

  • Scripture as God’s authoritative Word

Second-order (urgent)

These shape church practice and often form denominations.

  • Baptism practice (infant vs believers; modes)

  • Church government / polity

  • Some disputed matters in spiritual gifts practice (depending on how they’re taught and enforced)

  • The role of women in ministry

Third-order (important, but not dividing)

Believers can disagree and still worship and serve together in the same local church.

  • Most eschatology models (millennial views, timing details)

  • Age of the earth

  • Many “how-to” ministry approaches

Additional Fourth-order (conscience / adiaphora)

Personal convictions that should not be imposed as universal law.

  • Diet, special days, media choices, schooling preferences, etc. (Rom 14 principles)

4) So where do tongues fit?

This is a crucial question driving a lot of confusion.

Tongues as a gift: biblical and beautiful

Tongues appear in the New Testament as one of the gifts of the Spirit (1 Cor 12–14). Many believers have been genuinely strengthened through it, and the church should neither mock spiritual gifts nor reduce the Spirit’s work to one expression.

Tongues as a salvation test: spiritually dangerous

The moment someone teaches:

“If you don’t speak in tongues, you are not born again / not Spirit-baptized / not saved,”

they have moved tongues from gift to gospel gate.

That’s not a “third-order disagreement.” That becomes a first-order threat, because it adds a requirement to salvation that Scripture does not universally require. It also produces predictable fruit:

  • Anxiety, comparison, and pressure

  • Suspicion toward faithful believers

  • Division in the Body of Christ

  • A drift toward “experience-as-proof” instead of Christ-as-proof

Paul’s logic in 1 Corinthians is hard to miss:

  • The Spirit distributes gifts as He wills (1 Cor 12:11).

  • Gifts are diverse, and not everyone has the same gift (1 Cor 12:29–30).

  • Love and edification are central (1 Cor 13–14).

The Spirit is essential. Tongues are not universal.
The Giver is essential. Gifts vary.

So in triage terms:

  • Tongues as a spiritual gift = usually third-order (important, can be discussed charitably).

  • Tongues as the mandatory evidence of salvation / new birth = becomes first-order, because it distorts the Gospel by making salvation hinge on a particular sign.

5) Cult-like dogma patterns to watch for

Not every intense group is a cult. But “cult-like” dynamics show up when people elevate a translation, formula, experience, or teacher into an exclusive salvation requirement.

Here are major red flags:

A) Adding a salvation requirement beyond the Gospel

Examples people sometimes elevate into “must-have or you’re not saved”:

  • “You must speak in tongues to be born again.”

  • “You must be baptized with this exact formula or you’re unsaved.”

  • “You must keep the seventh-day Sabbath as the seal of God, even under the new covenant.”

  • “You must subscribe to this confession to be saved” (e.g., Westminster Confession of Faith treated as a salvation test).

  • “You must not be a Calvinist / must be a Calvinist to be saved.”

  • Anti-Trinitarianism (denying the Father/Son/Spirit reality revealed in Scripture).

The common error isn’t zeal. It’s moving something from discipleship into justification—from “obey Jesus” into “earn your badge.”

B) Re-framing Christian identity around one “secret” or one “proof”

When the community’s identity becomes:

  • the “right” translation only,

  • the “right” experience only,

  • the “right” teacher only,

  • the “right” conspiracy narrative,

it often results in fear-based control and constant boundary policing.

C) Declaring most believers unsaved

This is the relational nuclear weapon:

  • “Your testimony doesn’t count unless it matches our proof.”

  • “Your church is darkness; only we have light.”

  • “If you don’t submit to our view, you’re resisting Jesus.”

That posture doesn’t produce the unity of the Spirit (Eph 4). It fractures the body and often isolates people from healthy fellowship, discipleship, and growth.

D) Conspiratorial certainty

Claims that “modern translations are a Satanic plot” or that nearly everyone is deceived can function like spiritual coercion:

  • it immunizes the group against correction,

  • it replaces humble Berean testing (Acts 17:11) with an “us vs them” worldview.

Naming a few examples

Groups commonly recognised as outside historic Christian orthodoxy because they deny core first-order truths include:

  • Jehovah’s Witnesses (non-Trinitarian; redefines Christ)

  • The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (adds authoritative revelation; redefines God/Christ)

  • Christian Science (reframes sin, evil, and healing in ways that depart from apostolic teaching)

We can be respectful and kind toward individuals while still being clear about doctrinal boundaries.

6) A pastoral word to my fellow believers

If you’ve been told you’re not saved because you didn’t speak in tongues, or because you weren’t baptized in the “right” way, or because you don’t use the “right” Bible translation:

Come back to Christ Himself and abide in Him. (Matt 11:28-30, John 15:1-5)
He is our wisdom, righteousness, sanctification, and redemption (1 Cor 1:30).
There is no condemnation for those in Christ Jesus (Rom 8:1).
Nothing can separate you from the love of God in Christ (Rom 8:38–39).

If you’re in a heated conversation with someone you love:

  • Hold boundaries without hatred.

  • Refuse manipulation.

  • Keep returning to the Gospel centre.

  • Ask: “Does this teaching make me cling to Jesus more… or does it make me perform for approval?”

7) First 30 days for a new believer

If you’re newly coming to faith, or you want to help someone who is:

  1. Read the Gospels (start with John, then Matthew or Mark)

  2. Pray simply daily: “Jesus, lead me. Teach me. Change me.”

  3. Join a healthy local church with humble, Bible-shaped leadership

  4. Be baptized as an act of obedience and public confession

  5. Learn to abide (John 15:1-17): Scripture, prayer, repentance, community, love

  6. Serve in love—not to earn salvation, but because you have received grace and the perfect love that casts out fear

  7. Don’t ultimately chase signs; pursue the Saviour
    Gifts may come in different forms and it is good to seek helpful gifts; but the fruit of the Spirit is the long-game evidence of a Spirit-led life.

If you want a structured pathway, you can also walk through a beginner-friendly discipleship process (many churches run something like an Alpha-style course), then move into deeper formation and transformation—abiding, pruning, offering, and fruitfulness in Christ.

Closing encouragement

The goal isn’t to win arguments. The goal is to keep the Gospel clear, disciple people faithfully, and protect the unity of the Body without compromising truth.

Jesus is absolute. The Gospel is not negotiable.
And the Spirit’s work is real—often powerful, sometimes dramatic, always aimed at making us more like Christ.

For more info, feel free to click on any of the following –

Salvation, Abiding in Christ, Life by the Spirit.

Evidence of spiritual rebirth

One Spirit, Many Gifts

Grace and peace in Christ. 🙏

Disclaimer: A.I. tools (ChatGPT and/or Perplexity) were used for content refinement and editorial support, sometimes including targeted idea generation or drafting. All content remains the responsibility of the author.
For more details on using A.I. responsibly, click here.

Going Deeper: Cult-Like Dogma and Salvation-Adding Doctrines

Religious and cult-like groups often elevate specific translations, teachers, practices, experiences, or interpretations as the absolute and exclusive requirement for salvation.

In doing so, they move beyond biblical orthodoxy and add conditions to the gospel, effectively replacing salvation by grace through faith in Christ with a gated system of doctrinal or experiential compliance.

What follows are common examples, ranging from overt cults to cult-like dogmas that can emerge within otherwise Christian contexts.

KJV 1611-Onlyism

Adherents of the King James Only (KJVO) movement believe the 1611 King James Version is the only perfectly preserved Word of God.

Extreme factions—particularly those influenced by Peter Ruckman—claim:

  • The KJV is more accurate than the original Hebrew and Greek

  • Modern translations (NIV, ESV, NASB, etc.) are corrupt or Satanic

  • Those who read or trust other translations cannot be truly saved

This elevates a 17th-century English translation to a functional fourth member of the Trinity and undermines both Scripture’s original languages and the doctrine of providential preservation.

Jesus-Only (Anti-Pauline) Groups

Some radical groups reject or marginalise the Apostle Paul’s letters, claiming he:

  • “Hijacked” Christianity

  • Replaced Jesus’ teachings with a false doctrine of grace

  • Corrupted Torah obedience with “cheap grace”

These groups often insist that:

  • Only the red-letter words of Jesus are authoritative

  • Paul contradicts Jesus

  • Faith alone is a later invention

Such views appear in fringe Hebrew Roots, pseudo-Messianic, or restorationist movements and directly contradict Jesus’ commissioning of the apostles and the unified witness of the New Testament.

Tongues as “Initial Evidence” of Salvation

While many Pentecostal and charismatic Christians affirm the ongoing gifts of the Spirit, Oneness Pentecostal groups (often called “Jesus Only” Pentecostals) frequently teach that:

  • Speaking in tongues is the required physical proof of being born again

  • Those who have not spoken in tongues do not have the Holy Spirit

  • Therefore, they are not saved

This shifts assurance from Christ’s finished work to a repeatable spiritual manifestation, creating anxiety, spiritual elitism, and often pressure to manufacture experiences.

Exclusive Baptismal Formulas

Closely connected to “Jesus Only” theology is the belief that:

  • Baptism must be performed only in the name of Jesus Christ

  • Trinitarian baptism (Father, Son, Holy Spirit) is invalid

  • Those baptised using the Trinitarian formula are unsaved and must be rebaptised

This turns baptism from a sign of grace into a gatekeeping mechanism, despite Scripture’s broader testimony regarding salvation, faith, and the work of the Spirit.

Perfectionism as a Requirement for Salvation

Some groups teach that believers:

  • Must reach sinless perfection or a defined state of moral victory

  • Must fully overcome all known sin before they can be saved or sealed

  • Will forfeit salvation if they fall short of this standard

This doctrine:

  • Confuses justification with sanctification

  • Undermines assurance

  • Places the believer’s performance where Christ’s righteousness should stand

Historically, this appears in extreme holiness movements and modern hyper-discipleship systems.

Sabbath-as-Salvation or “Seal” Theology

Certain groups—most notably within Seventh-day Adventist Church offshoots or splinter movements—teach that:

  • Observance of the seventh-day Sabbath is the final “seal of God”

  • Sunday worship is or will become the mark of the beast

  • Faithful Sunday-keeping Christians will ultimately be condemned

While many Sabbath-keeping Christians hold their conviction graciously, when Sabbath observance becomes a salvation boundary, the gospel is functionally replaced by calendar compliance.

Flat-Earth Extremism as a Salvation Test

In more recent years, a fringe movement has emerged claiming:

  • A literal flat-earth cosmology is required to “truly believe the Bible”

  • Those who accept a globe model are deceived, compromised, or unsaved

  • Science, astronomy, and mainstream Christianity are part of a global satanic lie

This reflects cultic epistemology, where belief in a specific conspiracy becomes the proof of spiritual enlightenment and salvation.

Conspiratorial Salvation Frameworks

Many cult-like movements share a common conspiratorial mindset, including beliefs that:

  • Modern Bible translations are part of a Satanic or “New World Order” agenda

  • The institutional church is wholly apostate

  • Only their group has “the truth”

  • Persecution or rejection proves they are the faithful remnant

These frameworks often:

  • Isolate followers

  • Create fear-based loyalty

  • Replace gospel clarity with suspicion and control

Key Diagnostic Pattern

Across all these examples, the pattern is consistent:

  • Something other than Christ becomes the decisive marker of salvation

  • Assurance is relocated from faith in Christ to compliance with a system

  • Unity in the body of Christ is fractured

  • Secondary issues are absolutised

  • Scripture is selectively read to support a predetermined conclusion

This is precisely why the 5-Lens Framework is vital:

  • Lens 1 (Scripture) exposes gospel additions

  • Lens 2 (Experience) reveals spiritual harm and distortion

  • Lens 3 (Tradition) shows these are recurring historical errors

  • Lens 4 (Reason) identifies incoherence and contradiction

  • Lens 5 (Emotion/Intuition) helps discern fear-driven manipulation

Pastoral Closing Note

Not all who hold these views do so maliciously. Many are sincere, zealous, and seeking faithfulness.

However, sincerity does not sanctify false gospels, and zeal without truth can still wound the body of Christ.

The gospel remains:

Salvation by grace alone, through faith alone, in Christ alone — to the glory of God alone.

Anything that adds a requirement God did not add must be tested, corrected, and, where necessary, resisted for the sake of truth and love.

When Orthodoxy Becomes Exclusivity: How Any Denomination Can Drift Toward Cult-Like Dogma

Historic Christian denominations arose to guard truth, preserve worship, and shepherd God’s people. At their best, they are gifts to the church.

However, any denomination—ancient or modern—can drift into a cult-like posture when it begins to:

  • Claim exclusive ownership of salvation

  • Deny the legitimacy of other Christ-confessing believers

  • Elevate institutional authority, tradition, or a theological system above Scripture

  • Treat disagreement as rebellion rather than discernment

This section offers examples across major Christian traditions, not to attack, but to help believers recognise warning signs and remain anchored in Christ alone.

Roman Catholicism: The Strongest Historical Claims to Exclusivity

Historic Exclusivist Claims

The Roman Catholic Church has historically made the most explicit claims to institutional exclusivity, most famously expressed in the maxim:

Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus — “Outside the Church there is no salvation.”

For centuries, this was interpreted to mean:

  • Salvation is found only within communion with Rome

  • Submission to the Pope is necessary for salvation

  • Protestant sacraments and ministries are invalid

Key developments reinforcing this included:

  • Papal supremacy and infallibility (defined at Vatican I, 1870)

  • The Magisterium as the final interpreter of Scripture

  • The sacramental system as necessary channels of saving grace

Modern Developments and Continuing Tensions

Since Vatican II (1962–65), official Catholic teaching has softened language, acknowledging that:

  • Protestants are “separated brethren”

  • God may save those outside visible Catholic structures

However, functional exclusivism remains common at the grassroots level, where some Catholics still believe:

  • Protestants lack valid sacraments

  • Assurance of salvation is presumptuous

  • Justification by faith alone is heretical

  • The Catholic Church is the one true church in a way no other body is

When institutional loyalty or sacramental participation becomes the decisive test of salvation, Roman Catholicism moves from historic orthodoxy into cult-like boundary-keeping, even while affirming core creeds.

Eastern Orthodoxy: Apostolic Continuity Turned into Boundary Policing

The Eastern Orthodox Church treasures apostolic succession, the early creeds, and sacramental life. At its best, it preserves deep theological and liturgical riches.

However, in some expressions, Orthodoxy can become ethno-ecclesial and exclusive, with claims such as:

  • Only Orthodoxy preserves the true church

  • Western Christianity is fundamentally corrupted

  • Protestants lack real sacraments or ecclesial legitimacy

In extreme forms, this leads to:

  • Dismissing all non-Orthodox Christians as outside the church

  • Treating theological disagreement as spiritual deficiency

  • Confusing historical continuity with exclusive salvific authority

This posture mirrors cult-like thinking when historical pedigree replaces gospel clarity.

Lutheranism: Confessional Purity as a Gatekeeper

Historic Lutheranism treasures justification by faith alone and fidelity to Scripture. Yet some confessional Lutheran groups can become hyper-skeptical of all other traditions, believing:

  • Only Lutheran theology correctly preserves the gospel

  • Other Protestants compromise justification

  • Charismatic or evangelical expressions are spiritually suspect

When doctrinal precision becomes a test of salvation rather than fellowship, Lutheranism risks turning a gospel recovery movement into a closed theological system.

Calvinism (Reformed Traditions): Election Weaponised

Reformed theology has made enormous contributions to biblical clarity and God-centred worship. However, some Calvinist circles become dogmatically sectarian, claiming:

  • Arminians are semi-Pelagian or heretical

  • Non-Calvinists deny God’s sovereignty

  • Only Reformed theology is truly “biblical”

In these environments:

  • The doctrine of election becomes a badge of spiritual superiority

  • Assurance is tied to theological alignment

  • Other believers are quietly or openly de-legitimised

When a theological system eclipses Christ himself, Calvinism can function cult-like, despite affirming orthodox creeds.

Arminian / Wesleyan Traditions: Free Will as the Litmus Test

Conversely, some Arminian or Wesleyan groups claim:

  • Calvinism makes God unjust or monstrous

  • Calvinists worship a different God

  • Election theology undermines love and responsibility

In extreme cases:

  • Calvinists are labelled heretics

  • Doctrinal disagreement is equated with moral failure

  • Assurance is tied to ongoing performance or decision-maintenance

Here, human freedom becomes absolutised, and unity in Christ is replaced by suspicion and caricature.

Pentecostal and Charismatic Movements: Experience as Proof of Salvation

Many Pentecostal churches affirm historic orthodoxy. Yet cult-like drift occurs when:

  • Certain spiritual experiences are required for salvation

  • Tongues, healing, or prophecy become proof of being “truly saved”

  • Non-charismatics are seen as spiritually dead or resistant to the Spirit

When experience becomes normative rather than diverse, spiritual hierarchy replaces gospel unity.

The Common Pattern Across All Traditions

Across all these examples—ancient or modern—the cult-like drift follows the same pattern:

  • Christ is affirmed verbally but displaced functionally

  • A secondary doctrine, structure, or experience becomes salvific

  • The group sees itself as uniquely faithful

  • Outsiders are diminished, pitied, or condemned

  • Scripture is filtered through institutional loyalty

This is not a problem of having convictions.
It is a problem of confusing orthodoxy with exclusivity.

A Necessary Pastoral Reminder

Not all Roman Catholics, Orthodox Christians, Lutherans, Calvinists, Arminians, or Pentecostals hold these attitudes. Many love Christ deeply and honour his body.

But any tradition can become cult-like when:

  • Unity in Christ is replaced with boundary-maintenance

  • Grace is eclipsed by control

  • Humility gives way to certainty without charity

The church remains one body not because of institutional alignment, but because of union with Christ.

“For no one can lay any foundation other than the one already laid, which is Jesus Christ.” (1 Corinthians 3:11)

Discernment Summary

  • Creeds guard orthodoxy

  • Denominations serve the church

  • Christ alone saves

When any system—no matter how historic or theologically rich—claims what belongs only to Christ, the warning lights should come on.

Going Deeper Again: Unbiblical Doctrines within Roman Catholicism That Fall Outside Christian Orthodoxy

The Roman Catholic Church affirms the early creeds (Apostles’, Nicene, Chalcedonian) and therefore shares important common ground with historic Christianity. However, over centuries, Rome developed additional dogmas that go beyond—and in several cases contradict—the teaching of Scripture and the faith of the early church.

These doctrines are not merely secondary differences; some directly affect the gospel, assurance, mediation, and authority, placing them outside the boundaries of Christian orthodoxy as defined by Scripture and the early creedal consensus.

What follows are the most serious concerns.

1. Papal Supremacy and Papal Infallibility

Doctrine:
The Pope is the supreme earthly authority over the church, and when speaking ex cathedra on matters of faith and morals, he is infallible.

Why This Is Concerning:

  • Scripture presents Christ alone as the head of the church (Eph 1:22–23; Col 1:18)

  • The apostles function collegially, not under a single monarch

  • Peter is corrected publicly by Paul (Gal 2:11–14)

  • No biblical warrant exists for an infallible post-apostolic office

This doctrine elevates a human office into a functional substitute for apostolic authority, undermining the final authority of Scripture.

2. The Magisterium as Final Interpreter of Scripture

Doctrine:
Scripture, Tradition, and the Magisterium together form the rule of faith, with the Magisterium holding the final interpretive authority.

Why This Is Concerning:

  • Scripture is treated as materially sufficient but not formally sufficient

  • The church is positioned above the Word rather than under it

  • Doctrines can be declared binding even when lacking biblical grounding

This reverses the biblical pattern where God’s Word judges the church, not the church judging God’s Word.

3. Justification by Faith Plus Sacraments (Not Faith Alone)

Doctrine:
Justification is a lifelong process involving faith, sacraments, infused grace, and cooperation with that grace.

Why This Is Concerning:

  • Scripture teaches justification as a once-for-all forensic declaration (Rom 5:1)

  • Works are the fruit of salvation, not the basis of it (Eph 2:8–10)

  • Assurance becomes impossible, as salvation is never fully secure

This effectively redefines the gospel, turning good news into conditional probation.

4. The Sacramental System as Necessary Channels of Saving Grace

Doctrine:
Grace is dispensed primarily through seven sacraments administered by the priesthood.

Why This Is Concerning:

  • Scripture teaches salvation is received by faith, not ritual participation

  • The New Testament priesthood belongs to all believers, not a clerical caste

  • Sacraments become mechanisms rather than signs

This places the church between the believer and Christ, compromising direct access to God.

5. The Mass as a Propitiatory Sacrifice

Doctrine:
The Eucharist is a true, propitiatory sacrifice offered repeatedly for sins.

Why This Is Concerning:

  • Hebrews teaches Christ’s sacrifice was once for all (Heb 7:27; 9:12; 10:10–14)

  • Re-presenting the sacrifice undermines its sufficiency

  • The Mass functions as a continual atonement rather than a memorial participation

This stands in direct tension with the finality of the cross.

6. Purgatory

Doctrine:
Believers must undergo post-mortem purification before entering heaven.

Why This Is Concerning:

  • No explicit biblical teaching supports purgatory

  • Christ’s atonement is sufficient to fully cleanse believers (1 John 1:7)

  • Suffering is reintroduced as a means of cleansing after justification

Purgatory weakens assurance and diminishes the completeness of Christ’s saving work.

7. Marian Dogmas (Especially the Most Problematic)

a) Immaculate Conception of Mary

Mary was conceived without original sin.

  • No biblical support

  • Contradicts Romans 3:23

  • Introduced dogmatically in 1854

b) Assumption of Mary

Mary was bodily assumed into heaven.

  • No scriptural basis

  • Defined dogmatically in 1950

  • Not taught in the early church

c) Mary as Mediatrix and Co-Redemptrix (Implicit Teaching)

Though not always dogmatically defined, Mary is functionally treated as:

  • A mediator of grace

  • An intercessor superior to Christ in compassion

This directly contradicts:

“There is one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus.” (1 Tim 2:5)

8. Prayers to Saints and Veneration Practices

Doctrine:
Believers may pray to saints for intercession.

Why This Is Concerning:

  • Scripture instructs believers to pray to God alone

  • No biblical example exists of praying to departed saints

  • Blurs the line between honour and invocation

This practice introduces unbiblical intermediaries into the believer’s relationship with God.

9. Indulgences

Doctrine:
Temporal punishment for sin may be reduced through indulgences.

Why This Is Concerning:

  • Has no biblical foundation

  • Historically tied to spiritual abuse

  • Treats forgiveness as partially transactional

Indulgences distort repentance and cheapen grace.

10. Denial of Full Assurance of Salvation

Doctrine:
Absolute assurance of salvation is considered presumptuous.

Why This Is Concerning:

  • Scripture repeatedly affirms assurance (Rom 8:1; 8:38–39; 1 John 5:13)

  • Believers are called to confidence in Christ, not uncertainty

  • Fear replaces filial trust

This undermines joy, freedom, and gospel confidence.

Why These Doctrines Matter

These teachings:

  • Add mediators beyond Christ

  • Add requirements beyond faith

  • Add authorities beyond Scripture

  • Add fear where assurance should dwell

Individually, some may appear subtle. Collectively, they form a parallel system of salvation that differs materially from apostolic Christianity.

Pastoral Clarification

Many Roman Catholics love Jesus sincerely and trust in his mercy—often in spite of official doctrine, not because of it. Salvation is not determined by denominational label, but by union with Christ through faith.

However, the official dogmas of Rome must still be evaluated honestly. When a church claims infallibility, mediatorial control, or sacramental necessity for salvation, the gospel itself is at stake.

Final Discernment Summary

  • The early creeds define Christian orthodoxy

  • Scripture is the final authority

  • Christ alone mediates salvation

  • Grace alone saves

  • Faith alone receives

  • God alone is glorified

Any system—ancient or modern—that adds to this foundation must be tested, corrected, and resisted in love.

“You have been severed from Christ, you who would be justified by the law; you have fallen away from grace.” (Galatians 5:4)

Share this Article